Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use.

Categories: Peer-Reviewed Literature

Tags: hsr workforce development, improvement science, information design, mixed methods, research design, translation dissemination & implementation

Author: Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson, Andrea C. Tricco, Andrea Proctor, Anne Hayes, Bev Holmes, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Brian Hutton, Caroline Blaine, Christine Marquez, David Moher, Gertrude Bourdon, Ian D. Graham, Jacques Fortin, Jamie Park, Jayne Holroyd-Leduc, Jemila Hamid, John N. Lavis, Julia E. Moore, Karen Michell, Laure Perrier, Linda Hubert, Marcello Tonelli, Mark Chignell, Mathieu Ouimet, Michael Hillmer, Monika Kastner, Moriah E. Ellen, Sabrine Jassemi, Sharlene Stayberg, Sharon E. Straus, Thomas Noseworthy, Victoria Schuckel

Downloads: 3