Workforce

This paper outlines new academic incentives at the system-, institution-, and person-level that, if implemented, could make proving societal impact an integral part of the research process.

While each organization will follow its own path towards a Race Equity Culture, our research suggests that all organizations go through a cycle of change as they transform from a white dominant culture to a Race Equity Culture.

In this essay, two women of Color researchers examine the intersections of race and disability and ask, ?What is the power and purpose of positioning and positionality statements?? Informed by Black feminist theory, and drawing from the DisCrit tenets of intersectional oppressions, historicity, and whiteness and ability as property, the authors focus on researchers? positioning in relation to how they engage and communicate knowledge about multiply marginalized people.

The authors report on the Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Cancer (MT-DIRC) program, a D&I training program for postdoctoral or early-career cancer prevention and control scholars.

Christopher F. Koller, President of the Milbank Memorial Fund, Lillie Tyson Head, President of VFOFLF, and Pamela Browner White, Chief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer and Senior Vice President of Communications at the American Board of Internal Medicine and the ABIM Foundation, spoke about the importance of building trust by acknowledging past harm, committing to do better, and partnering for the long term to improve trust in the health system.

Drawing on field experience and scientific literature, we explore the connection between citizen science and Indigenous local knowledge and demonstrate approaches for how citizen science can generate useful knowledge while at the same time strengthening Indigenous local knowledge systems.

This article provides fourstrategies for how individuals and institutions can engage in anti-racism allyship: (1) be an upstander duringmicroaggressions, (2) be a sponsor and advocate for physicians of color, (3) acknowledge academic titles andaccomplishments, and (4) challenge the idea of a ??standard fit?? for academic faculty and research. Skills in aca-demic allyship should be taught toallphysicians throughout the educational continuum to mitigate feelings ofisolation that racialized minority physicians frequently experience.

This toolkit is designed to highlight the opportunities and outline the challenges specific to greater use of technology in the service of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. It is designed for organizational leaders, Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officers (CDIOs), and others actively working to promote diverse, equitable and inclusive workplaces globally. It is intended to complement a range of related publications produced by the World Economic Forum?s Platform for Shaping the Future of the New Economy and Society: ?HR4.0: Shaping People Strategies in the Fourth Industrial Revolution?, developed in collaboration with the Forum?s community of Chief Human Resources Officers (CHROs) and a guide to sound decision-making in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, ?Workforce Principles for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stakeholder Capitalism in a Time of Crisis?.

This publication presents the final recommendations of an external advisory group AcademyHealth convened to help shape a sustainable, action-oriented strategy to address diversity, equity, & inclusion in the field

Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use.

The ACGME Equity Matters Video Library houses all the individual components of the ACGME Equity Matters curriculum and is accessible to anyone in the medical education community. No CME credit is provided for completion of the library?s resources. To ensure a safe environment, it is recommended that organizations using these videos show them under the proper guidance of a trained facilitator for large viewings.

This commentary will interrogate the ways we as health services researchers pose our research questions, create methodological approaches, and interpret our findings, and serve as a disciplinary self-critique that will expose how our disciplinary practices are steeped in white supremacy.

Collaborative research networks are increasingly used as an effective mechanism for accelerating knowledge transfer into policy and practice. This paper explored the characteristics and collaborative learning approaches of nine health research networks.

This guidance is meant to facilitate conversations between researchers and patient partners about authorship and/or acknowledgement regarding research projects on which they collaborate.

The Guidelines on Inclusive Language came together due to the growing need for more comprehensive and global guidelines to help authors, editors, and reviewers recognize the use of language and images that are inclusive and culturally sensitive.

This paper explores the rise & consequences of ?health equity tourism?, a phenomenon where previously unengaged investigators pivot into health equity research without developing the necessary scientific expertise for high-quality work.

This expert roundtable focuses on how the COVID-19 pandemic brought to light the serious and pervasive data gaps facing marginalized groups and what cross-cutting themes the panels found in their work.

Public research funding agencies and research organisations are increasingly accountable for the wider impacts of the research they support. While research impact assessment (RIA) frameworks and tools exist, little is known and shared of how these organisations implement RIA activities in practice.

This article offers a simple, easy to remember framework for designing impactful research. We call this framework: ?The 7Cs of Impact? ? Context, Communities, Constituencies, Challenge, Channels, Communication and Capture.

This tool describes how to conduct intensive equity assessments of existing programs, policies, and processes. The tool first describes the scoping work that needs to be done before conducting an equity assessment and then describes and provides guiding questions for each of the six steps in the in-depth equity assessment process.

Lotteries, self-review, open peer review, innovation prizes, and other approaches have emerged as potential research funding process alternatives, but each of these options comes with its own advantages and disadvantages.

This Horizon Scan provides an overview of existing DEI programs and practices to ultimately stimulate conversations and action that can advance DEI within health services and policy research.

This is the premier web portal for reaching diverse postdocs. Our services help diversify candidate pools for your open employment positions.

Despite racism?s alarming impact on health and the wealth of scholarship that outlines its ill effects, preeminent scholars and the journals that publish them routinely fail to interrogate racism as a critical driver of racial health inequities.

A guide to support funders seeking to develop and implement a preprint policy. The toolkit includes benefits of preprints for funders, guidlines on how to incorporate and review the use of preprints into current policies, and a preprint policy text document

The Pulse Check is not a downloadable tool, it is an interactive application. Access to the Pulse Check means you are taking it on behalf of/as an organization rather than receiving permission to view all of the questions.

A Racial Equity Impact Assessment (REIA) is a systematic examination of how different racial and ethnic groups will likely be affected by a proposed action or decision.

Tools, research, tips, and curricula for people who want to increase their own understanding and to help those working for racial justice at every level in systems, organizations, communities, & the culture at large.

Taking the model from the American Alliance of Museums? guides for transgender inclusion, these toolkits provide a common framework for analysis, a shared vocabulary, and best practices to address racial disparities specific to the scholarly publishing community.

This article identifies where the technology and data sectors can contribute skills, expertise, and assets in support of innovative workforce models and augment the development of public health workforce competencies.

The current evaluation paradigm must shift and mindsets and practices evolve. The Equitable Evaluation Initiative’s Equitable Evaluation Framework provides principles and orthodoxies to guide organizations.

How can health services research better ensure that high-value health care is consistently and affordably provided to different people, communities, and populations? That?s a fundamental question that this sector must answer if it?s to remain viable.

In this episode, Dr. Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds and Dr. Sylk Sotto talk with Dr. Aaron Carroll about the importance of diversity and equity in research, higher education, and medicine.

This article summarizes some of the challenges around data sharing and reuse and identifies where the technology and data sectors can contribute to fill current gaps to promote interoperability and data stewardship.

Using a blend of personal narrative and insights from a 23-year career as a Black critical health equity researcher, I share 10 critical lessons for Black and other health equity researchers of color.

Dan Gorenstein, host and executive producer of the national health policy podcast Tradeoffs, highlights ways health policy researchers and academics can share their work with reporters.

As 14 Truth, Racial Healing & Transformation places approach the fourth year of implementation, these briefs offer a glimpse into the opportunities, nuances & complexities of implementing a community-based collaboration.

Margo Edmunds and Abdul Shaikh lead attendees through an exercise on priority-setting for methods and data followed by a discussion of the results of the exercise.

Abdul Shaikh facilitates a discussion on emerging methods to advance health equity. Lisa Goldman Rosas presents on community-based participatory research, and Suzanne Tamang discusses how using big data can improve outcomes.

In this session, presenters Ninez Ponce and Juanita Chinn describe approaches to improving data collection and analysis with Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American people, and other under-represented groups.

Derek Griffith draws on his experience developing strategies to improve Black men?s health and to achieve racial, ethnic and gender equity in health to reflect on future directions for health equity research.

Rashida Dorsey leads a conversation with J?Mag Karbeah, Reginald Tucker-Seeley, and Jameta Barlow on topic areas including structural racism, measuring and reporting health disparities, and understanding intersectionality.

A virtual coffee chat between two noted changemakers about how to better align health services research to the priorities of policymakers and health system leaders.

This article summarizes what data should be included and identifies where the technology and data sectors can contribute to fill current gaps to measure equity, positive health, and well-being.

This guidebook proposes an equity-based approach as a way to restore communities as the true authors and owners of research, and to shift the way researchers and funders work with community-based organizations to uncover knowledge together.